Editorial Type: research-article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 22 Nov 2025

Pharmacogenomic Testing
Strategies and Technical Considerations for Clinical Laboratories

PhD,
MBA, MLS,
PhD,
MD, PhD,
PhD,
MLS,
MD, PhD,
MD, PhD,
PhD,
MD, PhD,
MD,
MD, PhD,
MD, and
MD, PhD
Article Category: Research Article
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2025-0179-CP
Save
Download PDF

Context.—

Clinical laboratories are increasingly implementing pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing. Although PGx is similar to genetic testing for other indications, there are unique aspects that laboratories should consider.

Objective.—

To aid clinical laboratories that are implementing clinical PGx testing by describing characteristics of PGx test design and validation, as well as approaches to reporting. Resources that are useful for clinical laboratories performing PGx testing will be highlighted.

Design.—

The College of American Pathologists formed a workgroup composed of laboratorians with expertise in clinical PGx testing. The workgroup included representatives from the Association for Molecular Pathology and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The workgroup reviewed pertinent literature, as well as experience from proficiency testing and from members’ laboratories.

Results.—

The workgroup recommends that laboratories implementing PGx consider the following concepts: testing platform, test design (ie, selection of pharmacogenes and variants/alleles), use of reference materials during test development and as controls during clinical runs, star allele and standard nomenclature systems, translations from genotype to predicted phenotype, and considerations for result reporting including making medication recommendations. The workgroup provides considerations when using report vendors, emphasizing the clinical laboratory’s role and responsibility when implementing such reporting tools from vendors.

Conclusions.—

Clinical laboratories should be familiar with the fundamentals of PGx, ensure that PGx testing meets the applicable regulatory requirements for all aspects of the clinical laboratory testing process, and follow recommendations for standardization of nomenclature and reporting.

Copyright: © 2025 College of American Pathologists 2025
word

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Ann M. Moyer, MD, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (email: Moyer.Ann@Mayo.edu).

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. See text for hyperlink.

Wool receives honoraria and serves on the advisory board of Diagnostica Stago, is a consultant for Abbvie, and is a speaker for Sysmex. The other authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Accepted: 08 Oct 2025
  • Download PDF